229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.35%
Positive growth while WLDS shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.95%
Cost increase while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
1.39%
Positive growth while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.94%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.23%
R&D growth while WLDS reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1480.00%
Other expenses change of 1480.00% while WLDS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
2.31%
Operating expenses growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.82%
Total costs growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-7.93%
Interest expense reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.22%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1.30%
EBITDA growth below 50% of WLDS's 14.90%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.02%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.85%
Operating income growth below 50% of WLDS's 14.74%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.49%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-83.69%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
0.02%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of WLDS's 13.02%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.11%
Tax expense reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.04%
Net income growth below 50% of WLDS's 12.85%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.56%
EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.56%
Diluted EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.09%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.13%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
