229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-21.52%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-21.50%
Cost reduction while WLDS shows 60.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-21.54%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.03%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.28%
R&D growth while WLDS reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-174.38%
Other expenses reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-4.08%
Operating expenses reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-18.77%
Total costs reduction while WLDS shows 0.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.43%
Interest expense reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.48%
D&A growth less than half of WLDS's 57.14%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-25.96%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.66%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.74%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.93%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
164.78%
Other expenses growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-26.92%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.89%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.42%
Tax expense reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-27.78%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.98%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.01%
EPS decline while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-27.62%
Diluted EPS decline while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.69%
Share count reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.70%
Diluted share reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
