229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.66%
Positive growth while WLDS shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
10.57%
Cost increase while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
6.16%
Positive growth while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-2.31%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.53%
R&D reduction while WLDS shows 40.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1353.85%
Other expenses reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
2.96%
Operating expenses growth less than half of WLDS's 79.76%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
8.94%
Total costs growth less than half of WLDS's 78.97%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
15.02%
Interest expense change of 15.02% while WLDS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
2.14%
D&A growth less than half of WLDS's 9.09%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
9.54%
EBITDA growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.80%
EBITDA margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.88%
Operating income growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.72%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2270.00%
Other expenses reduction while WLDS shows 44.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
6.90%
Pre-tax income growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
8.61%
Tax expense change of 8.61% while WLDS maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
6.58%
Net income growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.92%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.50%
EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.50%
Diluted EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.82%
Share count reduction while WLDS shows 35.13% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.88%
Diluted share reduction while WLDS shows 35.13% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
