229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-19.05%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-20.89%
Cost reduction while WLDS shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-16.60%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.02%
Margin expansion while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-3.27%
R&D reduction while WLDS shows 17.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-116.28%
Other expenses reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-7.58%
Operating expenses reduction while WLDS shows 12.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-18.49%
Total costs reduction while WLDS shows 13.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.28%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-0.62%
D&A reduction while WLDS shows 91.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-19.82%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.95%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.37%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.87%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
116.28%
Other expenses growth less than half of WLDS's 495.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-20.33%
Pre-tax income decline while WLDS shows 12.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.58%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-24.94%
Tax expense reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-19.46%
Net income decline while WLDS shows 12.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.51%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.05%
EPS decline while WLDS shows 13.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-19.15%
Diluted EPS decline while WLDS shows 13.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.66%
Share count reduction while WLDS shows 1.36% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.68%
Diluted share reduction while WLDS shows 1.36% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
