229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
33.61%
Positive growth while WLDS shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
31.89%
Cost increase while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
35.69%
Positive growth while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.56%
Margin expansion while WLDS shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
5.32%
R&D growth while WLDS reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Other expenses change of 100.00% while WLDS maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
8.36%
Operating expenses growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
26.84%
Total costs growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
7.35%
D&A growth while WLDS reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
45.91%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 14.90%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
9.21%
EBITDA margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
49.70%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 14.74%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
12.05%
Operating margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-272.41%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
49.36%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 13.02%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
11.79%
Pre-tax margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
58.51%
Tax expense change of 58.51% while WLDS maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
47.74%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x WLDS's 12.85%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
10.58%
Net margin growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
48.98%
EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
49.32%
Diluted EPS growth while WLDS declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.57%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.61%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
