229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-24.10%
Revenue decline while WLDS shows 462.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-25.09%
Cost reduction while WLDS shows 433.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-22.94%
Gross profit decline while WLDS shows 618.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.53%
Margin expansion below 50% of WLDS's 27.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.69%
R&D growth while WLDS reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.20%
Operating expenses reduction while WLDS shows 3.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-20.89%
Total costs reduction while WLDS shows 9.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.42%
D&A reduction while WLDS shows 20.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-28.89%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.30%
EBITDA margin decline while WLDS shows 81.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.89%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.95%
Operating margin decline while WLDS shows 81.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
416.00%
Other expenses growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-30.42%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.32%
Pre-tax margin decline while WLDS shows 80.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.98%
Tax expense reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-30.31%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.18%
Net margin decline while WLDS shows 80.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.14%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-29.82%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.67%
Share count reduction while WLDS shows 3.01% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.72%
Diluted share reduction while WLDS shows 3.01% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
