229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.48%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-4.92%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-6.13%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.69%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.30%
R&D growth while WLDS reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.80%
Operating expenses growth while WLDS reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.62%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.49%
D&A growth while WLDS reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-8.24%
EBITDA decline while WLDS shows 14.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.92%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.13%
Operating income decline while WLDS shows 14.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.86%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.13%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-9.14%
Pre-tax income decline while WLDS shows 13.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.87%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.50%
Tax expense reduction while WLDS shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-9.26%
Net income decline while WLDS shows 12.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.99%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.50%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.50%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.56%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.75%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
