229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
8.23%
ROE of 8.23% while SONO has zero. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if minor profitability translates into a competitive edge.
3.30%
ROA of 3.30% while SONO has zero. Walter Schloss would see if this modest profit advantage can be scaled.
5.40%
ROCE of 5.40% while SONO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if partial profitability can be accelerated.
38.93%
Gross margin 75-90% of SONO's 47.17%. Bill Ackman would ask if incremental improvements can close the gap.
26.65%
Positive operating margin while SONO is negative. John Neff might see a significant competitive edge in operations.
20.85%
Positive net margin while SONO is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage vs. the competitor.