229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
14.34%
Positive ROE while SONO is negative. John Neff would see if this signals a clear edge over the competitor.
3.51%
Positive ROA while SONO shows negative. Mohnish Pabrai might see this as a clear operational edge.
5.73%
Positive ROCE while SONO is negative. John Neff would see if competitive strategy explains the difference.
38.36%
Similar gross margin to SONO's 41.70%. Walter Schloss would check if both companies have comparable cost structures.
22.04%
Positive operating margin while SONO is negative. John Neff might see a significant competitive edge in operations.
19.29%
Positive net margin while SONO is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage vs. the competitor.