229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-3.19%
Negative ROE while SONY stands at 6.34%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-1.54%
Negative ROA while SONY stands at 1.90%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-4.09%
Negative ROCE while SONY is at 2.83%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
49.31%
Gross margin 1.25-1.5x SONY's 34.17%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if this advantage is sustainable.
-5.81%
Negative operating margin while SONY has 6.84%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-3.47%
Negative net margin while SONY has 8.45%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.