229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
4.60%
Positive ROE while SONY is negative. John Neff would see if this signals a clear edge over the competitor.
2.32%
Positive ROA while SONY shows negative. Mohnish Pabrai might see this as a clear operational edge.
5.33%
Positive ROCE while SONY is negative. John Neff would see if competitive strategy explains the difference.
47.29%
Gross margin above 1.5x SONY's 30.95%. David Dodd would assess whether superior technology or brand is driving this.
8.05%
Positive operating margin while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a significant competitive edge in operations.
5.39%
Positive net margin while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage vs. the competitor.