229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-2.47%
Negative ROE while SONY stands at 1.41%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-1.05%
Negative ROA while SONY stands at 0.33%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-3.09%
Negative ROCE while SONY is at 1.64%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
15.09%
Gross margin 50-75% of SONY's 25.89%. Martin Whitman would worry about a persistent competitive disadvantage.
-3.78%
Negative operating margin while SONY has 4.72%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-2.19%
Negative net margin while SONY has 1.46%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.