0.56 - 0.61
0.03 - 0.62
42.60M / 30.74M (Avg.)
-0.59 | -0.01
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
15.19%
Positive revenue growth while Aerospace & Defense median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
-4.28%
Negative gross profit growth while Aerospace & Defense median is -8.33%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
19.54%
Positive EBIT growth while Aerospace & Defense median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong competitive advantage in operations.
19.59%
Positive operating income growth while Aerospace & Defense is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
18.62%
Positive net income growth while Aerospace & Defense median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
31.58%
Positive EPS growth while Aerospace & Defense median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong advantage in per-share earnings compared to peers.
31.58%
Positive diluted EPS growth while Aerospace & Defense median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a real advantage in how this firm manages share count or drives net income.
21.35%
Share growth above Aerospace & Defense median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
21.35%
Diluted share growth above 2x Aerospace & Defense median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.79%
Negative OCF growth while Aerospace & Defense median is -92.33%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
15.97%
Positive FCF growth while Aerospace & Defense median is negative. Peter Lynch might view this as a notable advantage over peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
380.28%
Receivables growth far exceeding Aerospace & Defense median. Jim Chanos suspects potential red flags in revenue quality.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.16%
Asset growth 50-75% of Aerospace & Defense median. Guy Spier sees potential underinvestment or overcaution vs. peers.
-394.81%
Negative BV/share change while Aerospace & Defense median is 1.68%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-6.50%
Debt is shrinking while Aerospace & Defense median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.12%
SG&A decline while Aerospace & Defense grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.