1.75 - 1.81
1.03 - 2.41
122.5K / 296.7K (Avg.)
-1.36 | -1.31
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-4.59%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-4.59% vs AXSM's -27.96%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
-40.54%
Both AXSM and the company show zero Short-Term Investments Growth.
-4.61%
Below half of AXSM's -27.96%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.92%
Below half of AXSM's -25.53%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
10.64%
Below half AXSM's 31.26%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.58%
Below half of AXSM's 464.07%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.86%
Below half of AXSM's -10.73%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-12.14%
Less than half of AXSM's 59.68%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-100.00%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to AXSM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both AXSM and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-34.95%
Less than half of AXSM's 167.32%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-29.36%
Less than half of AXSM's 46.05%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.36%
Less than half of AXSM's -84.14%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
3.53%
Less than half of AXSM's 791.39%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
-3.88%
Below half AXSM's -23.15%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-25.46%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to AXSM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.65%
Below half AXSM's 154.13%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-4.86%
Below half AXSM's -10.73%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-40.54%
Both AXSM and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
-100.00%
Less than half of AXSM's 38.77%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
4.24%
Less than half of AXSM's 133.99%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.