1.75 - 1.81
1.03 - 2.41
122.5K / 296.7K (Avg.)
-1.36 | -1.31
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-19.90%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-19.90% vs GNPX's -61.17%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.90%
Below half of GNPX's -61.17%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.69%
Below half of GNPX's -50.62%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
6.10%
Higher PP&E (Net) Growth compared to GNPX's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both GNPX and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.84%
Below half of GNPX's -4.04%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.44%
0.5-0.75x GNPX's -36.31%. Martin Whitman worries about slower asset growth than competitor. Is it strategy or constraint?
65.60%
Less than half of GNPX's -38.99%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-100.00%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to GNPX's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both GNPX and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-13.55%
Less than half of GNPX's 144.34%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-8.01%
Less than half of GNPX's 13.75%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.01%
Less than half of GNPX's 13.75%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
7.31%
Less than half of GNPX's 37.22%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
-7.62%
≥ 1.5x GNPX's -2.94%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
-130.04%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to GNPX's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-45.22%
0.5-0.75x GNPX's -64.03%. Martin Whitman is wary of lagging equity growth vs. competitor.
-18.44%
0.5-0.75x GNPX's -36.31%. Martin Whitman sees underexpansion or possible missed opportunities.
-100.00%
Both GNPX and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
-100.00%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to GNPX's zero value, indicating worse performance.
19.60%
Less than half of GNPX's 61.17%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.