1.75 - 1.81
1.03 - 2.41
122.5K / 296.7K (Avg.)
-1.36 | -1.31
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
34.57%
Cash & equivalents growing 34.57% while GNPX's declined -61.17%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
68.63%
Higher Short-Term Investments Growth compared to GNPX's zero value, indicating better performance.
34.59%
Below half of GNPX's -61.17%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.58%
Below half of GNPX's -50.62%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-15.03%
Both GNPX and the company show zero PP&E (Net) Growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.19%
≥ 1.5x GNPX's -4.04%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.29%
Below half of GNPX's -36.31%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-18.99%
Less than half of GNPX's -38.99%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-51.38%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to GNPX's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-91.88%
Both GNPX and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-10.37%
Less than half of GNPX's 144.34%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-15.50%
Less than half of GNPX's 13.75%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.50%
Less than half of GNPX's 13.75%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
13.39%
Less than half of GNPX's 37.22%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
-7.92%
≥ 1.5x GNPX's -2.94%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
-32.48%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to GNPX's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.56%
Below half GNPX's -64.03%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
31.29%
Below half GNPX's -36.31%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
68.63%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to GNPX's zero value, indicating better performance.
-51.38%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to GNPX's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-35.43%
Less than half of GNPX's 61.17%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.