1.75 - 1.81
1.03 - 2.41
122.5K / 296.7K (Avg.)
-1.36 | -1.31
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-2.60%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-2.60% vs RVPH's -20.15%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.60%
Below half of RVPH's -20.15%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.51%
Other current assets growth < half of RVPH's -52.44%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-2.19%
Below half of RVPH's -21.29%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-4.69%
Both RVPH and the company show zero PP&E (Net) Growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.67%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to RVPH's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.21%
Both RVPH and the company show zero Total Non-Current Assets Growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.25%
Below half of RVPH's -21.29%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
28.73%
50-75% of RVPH's 49.94%. Bruce Berkowitz notes the company is paying suppliers faster or not stretching terms as competitor does.
27.69%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to RVPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38361.54%
Higher Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth compared to RVPH's zero value, indicating better performance.
-27.69%
Less than half of RVPH's 105.19%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
27.28%
Less than half of RVPH's 68.91%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.34%
Less than half of RVPH's 436.84%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.72%
Less than half of RVPH's 79.48%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
4.00%
Above 1.5x RVPH's 0.05%. Michael Burry suspects heavy new equity expansion or dilution.
-3.83%
Below half RVPH's -9.77%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.70%
Below half RVPH's -39.51%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-2.25%
Below half RVPH's -21.29%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
0.67%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to RVPH's zero value, indicating better performance.
-0.77%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to RVPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
2.64%
Less than half of RVPH's 20.15%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
