PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.75 - 1.81
1.03 - 2.41
122.5K / 296.7K (Avg.)
-1.36 | -1.31
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
121.05%
Some net income increase while AGEN is negative at -2149.15%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
473.10%
D&A growth well above AGEN's 21.14%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
20.60%
Some yoy growth while AGEN is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-20.60%
Negative yoy SBC while AGEN is 53.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
534.15%
Well above AGEN's 20.68% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
82.02%
A yoy AP increase while AGEN is negative at -505.46%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
107.35%
Some yoy usage while AGEN is negative at -332.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-145.76%
Negative yoy while AGEN is 83.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-3.22%
Negative yoy CFO while AGEN is 6.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-7359.68%
Both yoy lines negative, with AGEN at -246.77%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
We have some outflow growth while AGEN is negative at -104.25%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-7359.68%
Both yoy lines negative, with AGEN at -4529.05%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
37.62%
We repay more while AGEN is negative at -0.00%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
299.00%
We slightly raise equity while AGEN is negative at -99.78%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.