PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.75 - 1.81
1.03 - 2.41
122.5K / 296.7K (Avg.)
-1.36 | -1.31
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-50.43%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with AXSM at -16.13%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
7.46%
Less D&A growth vs. AXSM's 42.19%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
46.91%
Deferred tax of 46.91% while AXSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
9.40%
SBC growth while AXSM is negative at -26.54%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-262.74%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AXSM at -19.64%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-225.01%
Negative yoy AP while AXSM is 2044.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
155.76%
Some yoy usage while AXSM is negative at -114.53%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
9.40%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. AXSM's 2044.78%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-30.81%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with AXSM at -34.63%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
49.68%
Some CapEx rise while AXSM is negative at -8.92%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while AXSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth well above AXSM's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
82.07%
We have mild expansions while AXSM is negative at -8.92%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-1.11%
We cut debt repayment yoy while AXSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
207.88%
Issuance growth of 207.88% while AXSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.