PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.75 - 1.81
1.03 - 2.41
122.5K / 296.7K (Avg.)
-1.36 | -1.31
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-1.47%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with GNPX at -38.79%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-1.12%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with GNPX at -0.93%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
11.01%
Deferred tax of 11.01% while GNPX is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
20.13%
Less SBC growth vs. GNPX's 49.07%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
171.56%
Slight usage while GNPX is negative at -155.79%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.25%
AP growth of 36.25% while GNPX is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
60.10%
Some yoy usage while GNPX is negative at -156.21%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
20.13%
Some yoy increase while GNPX is negative at -143.47%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
23.86%
Some CFO growth while GNPX is negative at -465.77%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-1272.99%
Negative yoy CapEx while GNPX is 73.70%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1272.99%
We reduce yoy invests while GNPX stands at 73.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-196.64%
We cut debt repayment yoy while GNPX is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
1193.74%
Issuance growth of 1193.74% while GNPX is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.