PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.75 - 1.81
1.03 - 2.41
122.5K / 296.7K (Avg.)
-1.36 | -1.31
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
121.05%
Net income growth above 1.5x RVPH's 5.90%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
473.10%
D&A growth of 473.10% while RVPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
20.60%
Deferred tax of 20.60% while RVPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-20.60%
Both cut yoy SBC, with RVPH at -56.99%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
534.15%
Well above RVPH's 125.07% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
82.02%
AP growth well above RVPH's 101.70%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
107.35%
Growth well above RVPH's 159.63%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-145.76%
Negative yoy while RVPH is 81.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-3.22%
Negative yoy CFO while RVPH is 38.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-7359.68%
Negative yoy CapEx while RVPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth of 100.00% while RVPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-7359.68%
We reduce yoy invests while RVPH stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
37.62%
Debt repayment at 50-75% of RVPH's 52.51%. Martin Whitman would worry about partial lag if competitor gains advantage from lower debt burdens.
299.00%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. RVPH's 4129.39%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.