1.75 - 1.81
1.03 - 2.41
122.5K / 296.7K (Avg.)
-1.36 | -1.31
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-23.20%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with RVPH at -647.45%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
3.49%
D&A growth of 3.49% while RVPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
-100.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while RVPH stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
19.58%
SBC growth of 19.58% while RVPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
19.36%
Working capital change of 19.36% while RVPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
55.56%
AP growth of 55.56% while RVPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-124.52%
Negative yoy usage while RVPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
56.31%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. RVPH's 430.49%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-16.84%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with RVPH at -144.34%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
100.00%
CapEx growth of 100.00% while RVPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
We expand invests by 100.00% while RVPH is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate outflow that must be justified by returns vs. competitor’s stable approach.
-594.74%
We cut debt repayment yoy while RVPH is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.