PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.75 - 1.81
1.03 - 2.41
122.5K / 296.7K (Avg.)
-1.36 | -1.31
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-12.38%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with TRAW at -0.41%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-27.15%
Negative yoy D&A while TRAW is 33.33%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-5631.45%
Negative yoy deferred tax while TRAW stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
0.93%
SBC growth of 0.93% while TRAW is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-32.67%
Negative yoy working capital usage while TRAW is 1.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
107.56%
A yoy AP increase while TRAW is negative at -86.79%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-665.24%
Negative yoy usage while TRAW is 154.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
5631.45%
Well above TRAW's 153.59%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-36.10%
Negative yoy CFO while TRAW is 0.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
78.08%
CapEx growth of 78.08% while TRAW is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
78.08%
We expand invests by 78.08% while TRAW is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate outflow that must be justified by returns vs. competitor’s stable approach.
66.67%
Debt repayment growth of 66.67% while TRAW is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
210.14%
Issuance growth of 210.14% while TRAW is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.