PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ATNM)
1.780.01 (-0.56%)
1.75 - 1.81
1.03 - 2.41
122.5K / 296.7K (Avg.)
-1.36 | -1.31
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.73%
EBIT growth below 50% of AVXL's 35.99%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
2.45%
Operating income growth under 50% of AVXL's 35.99%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
10.71%
Positive net income growth while AVXL is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
23.59%
Positive EPS growth while AVXL is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
23.59%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AVXL is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
16.70%
Share count expansion well above AVXL's 31.51%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
16.70%
Diluted share count expanding well above AVXL's 31.51%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.06%
Negative OCF growth while AVXL is at 4.49%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-18.45%
Negative FCF growth while AVXL is at 4.42%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42182.97%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-53680.51%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while AVXL is at 62.18%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-38238.10%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AVXL stands at 50.04%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-21634.42%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-19064.37%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-68658.62%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-3403.93%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while AVXL stands at 375.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-569.70%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while AVXL is at 102.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-664.70%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while AVXL is at 108.48%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-39.92%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-169.45%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.82%
R&D dropping or stable vs. AVXL's 29.82%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
-13.19%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.