1.75 - 1.81
1.03 - 2.41
122.5K / 296.7K (Avg.)
-1.36 | -1.31
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-57.23%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-57.23%
Gross profit decline while CRVO shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.08%
R&D reduction while CRVO shows 5.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-0.47%
G&A reduction while CRVO shows 37.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.89%
Operating expenses reduction while CRVO shows 251.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.89%
Total costs reduction while CRVO shows 15.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.20%
D&A growth while CRVO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.74%
EBITDA growth while CRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-120.42%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.53%
Operating income growth while CRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-120.91%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.85%
Other expenses growth while CRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.62%
Pre-tax income growth while CRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-120.69%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.62%
Net income growth while CRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-120.69%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
13.79%
EPS growth while CRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.79%
Diluted EPS growth while CRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.10%
Share count reduction below 50% of CRVO's 2.84%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
10.10%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of CRVO's 2.84%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.