111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.39
5.09M / 4.21M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-14.20%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-14.20% vs CX's -1.16%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
-100.00%
Both CX and the company show zero Short-Term Investments Growth.
-22.35%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x CX's -1.16%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
26.24%
Receivables growth above 1.5x CX's 6.39%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
1.83%
Inventory growth below half of CX's 4.08%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
1495.65%
Above 1.5x CX's 29.58%. Michael Burry might investigate for potential short-term asset misclassification or risk.
6.38%
1.25-1.5x CX's 4.80%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if strong current asset growth is used effectively.
3.67%
0.75-0.9x CX's 4.31%. Bill Ackman questions if competitor invests more heavily in future capacity.
1.73%
Less than half of CX's -100.00%. David Dodd might see less intangible risk, assuming stable revenue growth.
2.57%
Less than half of CX's -100.00%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
1.81%
Less than half of CX's -100.00%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
-2.73%
Both CX and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.94%
Less than half of CX's 1112.55%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
3.06%
1.25-1.5x CX's 2.52%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if expansions surpass competitor's pace but remain justified.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.97%
1.25-1.5x CX's 2.96%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a stronger asset build. Check if it's producing returns.
18.94%
Higher Accounts Payable Growth compared to CX's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-2.74%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to CX's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.00%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to CX's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.07%
Less than half of CX's 5.79%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-0.32%
Less than half of CX's 5.79%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
10.73%
Less than half of CX's -100.00%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.94%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to CX's zero value, indicating worse performance.
12.67%
Less than half of CX's 67.11%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
3.92%
Above 1.5x CX's 2.03%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.67%
50-75% of CX's 3.63%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a lower yoy liability increase.
-0.35%
Less than half of CX's 131531.18%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
3.13%
0.5-0.75x CX's 5.44%. Martin Whitman is wary of weaker retention or lower profitability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Less than half of CX's -79.59%. David Dodd notes simpler yoy equity changes vs. competitor.
5.81%
≥ 1.5x CX's 2.26%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
1.50%
0.5-0.75x CX's 2.96%. Martin Whitman sees underexpansion or possible missed opportunities.
-100.00%
Both CX and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
0.96%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to CX's zero value, indicating worse performance.
4.68%
Above 1.5x CX's 1.16%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.
