111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.75%
Revenue growth under 50% of CX's 13.06%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
2.75%
Gross profit growth under 50% of CX's 23.58%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
2.75%
EBIT growth below 50% of CX's 89.85%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
2.75%
Operating income growth under 50% of CX's 70.77%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
2.70%
Positive net income growth while CX is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
4.76%
Positive EPS growth while CX is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
4.76%
Positive diluted EPS growth while CX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-1.97%
Share reduction while CX is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.97%
Reduced diluted shares while CX is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
164.94%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x CX's 9.37%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
125.55%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x CX's 58.59%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
71.05%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x CX's 1.13%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
214.29%
Below 50% of CX's 911.84%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
57.14%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x CX's 19.86%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.