PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-25.35%
Negative revenue growth while CX stands at 3.42%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
594.85%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x CX's 1.41%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
1007.19%
EBIT growth above 1.5x CX's 0.78%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
1007.19%
Operating income growth above 1.5x CX's 0.78%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
214.64%
Net income growth above 1.5x CX's 0.48%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
85.71%
Positive EPS growth while CX is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
76.19%
Positive diluted EPS growth while CX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
2.37%
Slight or no buybacks while CX is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
2.37%
Slight or no buyback while CX is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
102.39%
10Y CAGR of 102.39% while CX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
44.51%
5Y CAGR of 44.51% while CX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
-11.10%
Negative 3Y CAGR while CX stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
396.48%
Net income/share CAGR of 396.48% while CX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
193.37%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 193.37% while CX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.