PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.90%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x CX's 10.85%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
-67.09%
Negative gross profit growth while CX is at 12.71%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-93.13%
Negative EBIT growth while CX is at 26.06%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-93.13%
Negative operating income growth while CX is at 26.06%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
13.90%
Positive net income growth while CX is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
8.33%
Positive EPS growth while CX is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
8.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while CX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.01%
Share reduction while CX is at 1.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.05%
Reduced diluted shares while CX is at 1.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
187.25%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while CX is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
60.19%
Positive 5Y CAGR while CX is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
16.73%
Positive 3Y CAGR while CX is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
165.62%
Positive 10Y CAGR while CX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
32.81%
Positive 5Y CAGR while CX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-36.76%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
63.54%
Positive short-term equity growth while CX is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.