PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
45.60%
Positive revenue growth while CX is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
402.71%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x CX's 0.48%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
3233.53%
EBIT growth above 1.5x CX's 3.79%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
3233.53%
Operating income growth above 1.5x CX's 3.79%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
228.01%
Positive net income growth while CX is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
346.15%
Positive EPS growth while CX is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
338.46%
Positive diluted EPS growth while CX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-28.12%
Share reduction while CX is at 4.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-27.47%
Reduced diluted shares while CX is at 4.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
527.53%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while CX is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
166.09%
Positive 5Y CAGR while CX is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
2359.29%
Positive 3Y CAGR while CX is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
729.57%
Positive 10Y CAGR while CX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
152.48%
Positive 5Y CAGR while CX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
41.63%
Positive short-term CAGR while CX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.