111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-16.58%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-34.45%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
144.25%
Positive EBIT growth while CX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
144.25%
Positive operating income growth while CX is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-41.75%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-99.72%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-99.72%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
330.40%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x CX's 146.23%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
206.03%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x CX's 75.41%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
86.77%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of CX's 102.97%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
519.70%
Positive 10Y CAGR while CX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
431.48%
Positive 5Y CAGR while CX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
164.38%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x CX's 9.73%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
We expand SG&A while CX cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
