111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-26.39%
Negative revenue growth while EXP stands at 34.99%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-26.39%
Negative gross profit growth while EXP is at 77.42%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-365.18%
Negative EBIT growth while EXP is at 84.68%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-365.18%
Negative operating income growth while EXP is at 93.86%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-21.64%
Negative net income growth while EXP stands at 85.56%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-100.00%
Negative EPS growth while EXP is at 88.06%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-100.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while EXP is at 88.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-100.00%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-100.00%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while EXP stands at 239.77%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y CAGR while EXP stands at 88.22%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-100.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while EXP stands at 31.63%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while EXP stands at 117.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while EXP is at 77.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-100.00%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while EXP is at 54.55%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.