111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
21.86%
Positive revenue growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
21.86%
Positive gross profit growth while EXP is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
21.86%
Positive EBIT growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
21.86%
Positive operating income growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
169.74%
Positive net income growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
160.00%
Positive EPS growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
160.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
3.74%
Share count expansion well above EXP's 0.11%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
3.74%
Slight or no buyback while EXP is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
137.57%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x EXP's 73.72%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
107.98%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x EXP's 73.72%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
69.63%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x EXP's 60.23%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
225.00%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of EXP's 445.45%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
100.00%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of EXP's 140.00%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.