111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-74.48%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-74.48%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
148.53%
EBIT growth above 1.5x EXP's 30.62%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
148.53%
Operating income growth above 1.5x EXP's 30.62%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
-87.47%
Negative net income growth while EXP stands at 49.37%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
118.03%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of EXP's 247.10%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
80.30%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of EXP's 135.78%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
14.58%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of EXP's 71.36%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
49.88%
Below 50% of EXP's 170.40%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
9.00%
Positive 5Y CAGR while EXP is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-42.91%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.