PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
69.54%
Positive revenue growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
483.23%
Positive gross profit growth while EXP is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
2778.72%
Positive EBIT growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
2778.72%
Positive operating income growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
307.97%
Positive net income growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
283.33%
Positive EPS growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
275.00%
Diluted EPS growth of 275.00% while EXP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
22.77%
Share count expansion well above EXP's 0.01%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
23.91%
Slight or no buyback while EXP is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
243.99%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to EXP's 233.34%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
100.73%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of EXP's 128.49%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
64.96%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x EXP's 47.89%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
469.00%
Similar net income/share CAGR to EXP's 474.61%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
106.91%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x EXP's 23.94%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
97.91%
Positive short-term CAGR while EXP is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.