111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
45.60%
Positive revenue growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
402.71%
Positive gross profit growth while EXP is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
3233.53%
Positive EBIT growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
3233.53%
Positive operating income growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
228.01%
Positive net income growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
346.15%
Positive EPS growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
338.46%
Positive diluted EPS growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-28.12%
Share reduction while EXP is at 1.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-27.47%
Reduced diluted shares while EXP is at 1.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
527.53%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x EXP's 252.62%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
166.09%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x EXP's 56.45%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
2359.29%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x EXP's 31.84%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
729.57%
Similar net income/share CAGR to EXP's 777.48%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
152.48%
Positive 5Y CAGR while EXP is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
41.63%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of EXP's 53.33%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.