111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
28.94%
Positive revenue growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
330.73%
Positive gross profit growth while EXP is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
1860.29%
Positive EBIT growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1860.29%
Positive operating income growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
186.44%
Positive net income growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
186.96%
Positive EPS growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
186.96%
Positive diluted EPS growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.32%
Slight or no buybacks while EXP is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.38%
Slight or no buyback while EXP is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
323.43%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to EXP's 309.39%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
193.02%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x EXP's 43.48%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
29.78%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of EXP's 33.16%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
409.62%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of EXP's 465.52%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
2.65%
Positive 5Y CAGR while EXP is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
45.54%
Below 50% of EXP's 123.68%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We cut SG&A while EXP invests at 3.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.