PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
27.06%
Positive revenue growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
316.29%
Positive gross profit growth while EXP is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
1708.06%
Positive EBIT growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1708.06%
Positive operating income growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
132.28%
Positive net income growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
105.26%
Positive EPS growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
105.26%
Positive diluted EPS growth while EXP is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
11.99%
Slight or no buybacks while EXP is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
12.42%
Slight or no buyback while EXP is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
328.66%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of EXP's 404.60%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
2115.31%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x EXP's 144.97%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
48.07%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of EXP's 86.25%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
459.71%
Similar net income/share CAGR to EXP's 418.06%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
91.12%
Below 50% of EXP's 253.88%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
58.88%
Below 50% of EXP's 165.85%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.