PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.85%
Revenue growth under 50% of EXP's 17.31%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-22.92%
Negative gross profit growth while EXP is at 36.42%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
144.78%
EBIT growth above 1.5x EXP's 41.70%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
144.78%
Operating income growth above 1.5x EXP's 41.70%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
-39.05%
Negative net income growth while EXP stands at 35.01%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-99.75%
Negative EPS growth while EXP is at 40.96%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-99.75%
Negative diluted EPS growth while EXP is at 39.76%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
312.61%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of EXP's 471.16%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
128.85%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to EXP's 142.24%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
82.23%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of EXP's 97.94%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
314.20%
Below 50% of EXP's 701.24%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
280.00%
Below 50% of EXP's 1085.25%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
258.19%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of EXP's 355.79%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
We expand SG&A while EXP cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.