PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-12.49%
Negative revenue growth while EXP stands at 22.06%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
682.43%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x EXP's 96.03%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
140.62%
EBIT growth 50-75% of EXP's 230.85%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
140.62%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of EXP's 230.85%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
-48.59%
Negative net income growth while EXP stands at 309.52%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-99.71%
Negative EPS growth while EXP is at 314.75%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-99.71%
Negative diluted EPS growth while EXP is at 314.75%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
354.43%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x EXP's 227.26%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
215.80%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x EXP's 56.04%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
106.86%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x EXP's 7.99%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
255.61%
Positive 10Y CAGR while EXP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
487.10%
Positive 5Y CAGR while EXP is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
105.84%
Positive short-term CAGR while EXP is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
We expand SG&A while EXP cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.