111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.82%
Negative 5Y CAGR while EXP stands at 58.09%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-37.78%
Negative 3Y CAGR while EXP stands at 38.88%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.98%
Below 50% of EXP's 137.14%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
38.24%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of EXP's 86.15%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-43.73%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while EXP is 95.70%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-73.18%
Negative 3Y CAGR while EXP is 105.44%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.27%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x EXP's 51.64%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
46.82%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x EXP's 10.41%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.69%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while EXP is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
85.06%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while EXP cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.