PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-65.64%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-65.64%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
156.60%
EBIT growth below 50% of JHX's 386.17%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
156.60%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x JHX's 123.19%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.
-76.83%
Negative net income growth while JHX stands at 43.58%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
102.26%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of JHX's 117.83%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
79.31%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x JHX's 48.10%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
77.46%
Positive 3Y CAGR while JHX is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Below 50% of JHX's 586.41%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
42.86%
Positive short-term CAGR while JHX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.