PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.75%
Positive revenue growth while JHX is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
2.75%
Positive gross profit growth while JHX is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
2.75%
EBIT growth below 50% of JHX's 386.17%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
2.75%
Operating income growth under 50% of JHX's 123.19%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
2.70%
Net income growth under 50% of JHX's 43.58%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
4.76%
EPS growth under 50% of JHX's 50.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
4.76%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of JHX's 51.06%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-1.97%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.97%
Reduced diluted shares while JHX is at 0.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
164.94%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x JHX's 117.83%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
125.55%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x JHX's 48.10%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
71.05%
Positive 3Y CAGR while JHX is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
214.29%
Below 50% of JHX's 586.41%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
57.14%
Positive short-term CAGR while JHX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.