111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.18%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-92.55%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-93.04%
Negative EBIT growth while JHX is at 386.17%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-93.04%
Negative operating income growth while JHX is at 123.19%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-0.18%
Negative net income growth while JHX stands at 43.58%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.98%
Slight or no buybacks while JHX is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-4.39%
Reduced diluted shares while JHX is at 0.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
158.63%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x JHX's 117.83%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
104.58%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x JHX's 48.10%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
56.67%
Positive 3Y CAGR while JHX is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.86%
Below 50% of JHX's 586.41%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
56.61%
Positive short-term CAGR while JHX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
