PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
69.54%
Positive revenue growth while JHX is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
483.23%
Positive gross profit growth while JHX is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
2778.72%
EBIT growth above 1.5x JHX's 386.17%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
2778.72%
Operating income growth above 1.5x JHX's 123.19%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
307.97%
Net income growth above 1.5x JHX's 43.58%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
283.33%
EPS growth above 1.5x JHX's 50.00%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
275.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x JHX's 51.06%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
22.77%
Slight or no buybacks while JHX is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
23.91%
Diluted share count expanding well above JHX's 0.12%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
243.99%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x JHX's 117.83%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
100.73%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x JHX's 48.10%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
64.96%
Positive 3Y CAGR while JHX is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
469.00%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x JHX's 8.17% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
106.91%
Below 50% of JHX's 586.41%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
97.91%
Positive short-term CAGR while JHX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We cut SG&A while JHX invests at 2.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.