PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
32.26%
Positive revenue growth while JHX is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
339.49%
Positive gross profit growth while JHX is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
1632.99%
Positive EBIT growth while JHX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1632.99%
Positive operating income growth while JHX is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
103.24%
Positive net income growth while JHX is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
104.26%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x JHX's 80.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
104.26%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x JHX's 80.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
305.04%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while JHX is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
101.78%
Positive 5Y CAGR while JHX is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
25.10%
Positive 3Y CAGR while JHX is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
335.47%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x JHX's 72.67% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
110.46%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x JHX's 72.67%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
64.98%
Positive short-term CAGR while JHX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We cut SG&A while JHX invests at 2.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.