111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.83%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of JHX's 64.07%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
18.60%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of JHX's 39.34%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2303.31%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x JHX's 650.54%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
638.34%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of JHX's 4718.71%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
164.87%
Positive 5Y CAGR while JHX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
98.65%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x JHX's 29.99%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
63.13%
Below 50% of JHX's 548.19%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
34.69%
Below 50% of JHX's 685.07%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
232.95%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while JHX is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
117.84%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while JHX cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.