PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.07%
Negative revenue growth while MLM stands at 33.85%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-6.07%
Negative gross profit growth while MLM is at 62.39%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-6.07%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-6.07%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
48.41%
Net income growth under 50% of MLM's 182.76%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
60.00%
Positive EPS growth while MLM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
60.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MLM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-7.24%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-7.24%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.23%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MLM's 118.52%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
14.23%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MLM's 46.53%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
14.23%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to MLM's 13.59%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.