PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
CRH plc (CRH)
114.271.68 (1.49%)
111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
21.86%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x MLM's 17.01%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
21.86%
Gross profit growth similar to MLM's 20.83%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
21.86%
EBIT growth similar to MLM's 23.97%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
21.86%
Operating income growth similar to MLM's 23.97%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
169.74%
Net income growth above 1.5x MLM's 19.41%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
160.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x MLM's 19.70%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
160.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x MLM's 19.70%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
3.74%
Slight or no buybacks while MLM is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
3.74%
Slight or no buyback while MLM is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
137.57%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 88.28%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
107.98%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MLM's 88.28%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
69.63%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of MLM's 88.28%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
225.00%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 64.58%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
100.00%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 64.58%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.