111.48 - 114.40
76.75 - 114.40
5.09M / 4.23M (Avg.)
23.96 | 4.77
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-25.35%
Negative revenue growth while MLM stands at 7.57%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
594.85%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x MLM's 10.41%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
1007.19%
EBIT growth above 1.5x MLM's 16.49%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
1007.19%
Operating income growth above 1.5x MLM's 16.49%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
214.64%
Net income growth above 1.5x MLM's 6.54%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
85.71%
EPS growth above 1.5x MLM's 6.82%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
76.19%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x MLM's 6.82%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
2.37%
Share count expansion well above MLM's 0.01%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
2.37%
Diluted share count expanding well above MLM's 0.02%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
102.39%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of MLM's 141.40%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
44.51%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MLM's 141.40%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-11.10%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MLM stands at 72.45%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
396.48%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 96.43%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
193.37%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MLM's 57.15%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.